Lexbit does not provide services to or in sanctioned jurisdictions. Countries marked “Sanctioned” are subject to comprehensive or extensive sanctions programmes (UN, UK, EU and/or US) and are shown for information only.
Filter jurisdictions
Lexbit Country Risk Score (0–100, higher = higher risk). An indicative, transparent composite that we compute ourselves from openly published, citable data. It follows a common approach in country-risk modelling: several independent pillars, each normalised to 0–100 and combined with fixed weights, then mapped to bands. It is a screening aid — not a legal designation, credit rating or verdict on doing business.
| Pillar | Weight | How it is scored |
|---|---|---|
| FATF status | 20% | Black list (call for action) = 100; grey list (increased monitoring) = 60; not listed = 0. |
| Sanctions | 20% | Country-wide UN programme, or country-wide programmes by two or more of the UK, EU and US = 100; a single authority = 60; none = 0. |
| Corruption | 35% | 100 minus the Transparency International CPI 2025 score. |
| Tax transparency | 25% | Latest OECD Global Forum EOIR overall rating: Compliant = 0, Largely Compliant = 25, Partially Compliant = 70, Non-Compliant = 100 (provisional ratings used as published). If the jurisdiction is on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions (Annex I), the pillar is at least 80. |
Bands: Low 0–19 · Medium 20–34 · High 35–49 · Very High 50–100. Overrides: an FATF black-listed or comprehensively sanctioned jurisdiction is always Very High; an FATF grey-listed jurisdiction is at least High.
Missing data (*). We never estimate or fill in values. If a pillar has no data, the remaining weights are rescaled. Where open-source data is incomplete, the band is supplemented by KnowYourCountry country AML intelligence. Such cards are marked with an asterisk (*); where no open-source score can be computed, only the band is shown.
Sources (checked 15 October 2026): FATF black and grey lists (19 June 2026) · UK, EU, US and UN sanctions programmes (see “Sanctions” below) · Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2025 (published February 2026; data licensed CC BY 4.0) · OECD Global Forum EOIR ratings (table retrieved 15 October 2026) · EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions for tax purposes (Council update of 9 October 2026). The Basel AML Index was considered but not used, because its public edition is licensed for non-commercial use only.
Weights reflect Lexbit’s judgement and can be recalibrated; regulated firms should apply their own risk-based approach. Lexbit does not provide services to or in sanctioned jurisdictions.
Tiers are Lexbit’s own classification, intended as a quick orientation, not a rating of any country:
FATF status follows the official FATF lists published 19 June 2026: “High-Risk Jurisdictions subject to a Call for Action” (black list) and “Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring” (grey list). Source: FATF — black and grey lists. FATF updates these lists three times a year.
Sanctions flag marks jurisdictions under comprehensive or extensive country-wide programmes: Russia (UK, EU, US), Belarus (UK, EU, US), Iran (UN, UK, EU, US), North Korea (UN, UK, EU, US) and Cuba (US embargo). Russian-occupied regions of Ukraine (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk and others) are also subject to comprehensive restrictions. Syria is not flagged: the US removed its comprehensive Syria programme from 1 July 2025 and the EU and UK lifted most economic sanctions in 2025, although targeted listings remain. Many other countries have targeted (list-based) sanctions that are not shown here — always screen parties individually. Sources: UK sanctions regimes (FCDO/OFSI) · EU Sanctions Map · US OFAC sanctions programs · UN Security Council sanctions. Checked 14 October 2026.
Information only — not legal or compliance advice. Data last updated 15 October 2026.
We use strictly necessary cookies to run this website. With your consent we may also use analytics and marketing cookies. See our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.